If you have problems with a specific USB device / OS combination you should search the web.
There are standard devices like hubs, human interface, and storage volume which usually does not require a specific driver but will use a default driver provided by the OS. But non-standard devices require a specific driver. When this is not provided by the OS it must be installed (found new hardware with Windows).
Thanks, very nice doc, easy to navigate.
I need to study it in detail.
So far I am unclear why single USB device "belongs / need" multiple data / stuff like "human interface", "disk drive " , "volume" etc.
I am still not clear when the OS detects valid "plug and pray" USB device , with internal resources already known, why it goes thru all those dialogs.
I can see when external resources are needed, but I would expect that the OS would do , at least some stuff, "automatically" and just report " USB device installed , ready to run".
I think I just opened can of worms.
I can plug in my Arduino development port to "direct" USB port,it installs (on XP) without single problem as plug and play.No restart.
If I remove it and move it to my D-link port ABSOLUTELY nothing gets reported by XP.
Needles to say Arduino IDE no longer recognizes the COMx port as active and the only way to get it back is to uninstall the COMx,and rescan for new hardware. Than XP goes thru clear install and ask for "restart".
So far it looks as "chaining" USB - direct PC port , PCI USB interface and or D_link is pretty inconsistent.
I just wonder ( rhetorical question only ! ) if newer versions of Windows work better?
When my system is restarted then my screen brightness goes to 0 % I tested all possibilities like setting up for screen resolutions , Swapping Motherboards , swapping Processors , Even i had swapped RAM Three times engineer came and they are also doing same procedure which i have done earliest
From an Access application, I am trying to generate a ".accde"fileusing VBA from a ".accdb"file. I´m using the "app.SysCmd 603, INPATH, OUTPATH" method, but always returns0and do not works.
Any idea how to fix it?
NAT is super easy to setup in Linux (assuming you have a decent Linux and networking background). It's essentially already a capability built into the kernel, so you just have to configure it (no additional packages required). If it's an old machine, Linux can also make better use of available resources (i.e. not a resource hog), of course, assuming you pick a Linux distro that doesn't use a lot of resources (i.e. don't use Ubuntu w/ Unity, perhaps with MATE).
pick a Linux distro that doesn't use a lot of resources (i.e. don't use Ubuntu w/ Unity, perhaps with MATE).
I have an old broken machine that struggled with XP, installed Ubuntu server (by taking the hard disk out and putting it in another machine!) Runs apache and a few other things just fine. It's the GUI that hurts. I manage it remotely (ssh) of course.
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
I'm trying to deploy ultraVNC to multiple computers, could anyone tell me what is the easiest way to deploy ultraVNC without user interaction? I've tried using /silent and /very silent switch to hide the installation box, but so far keeps coming out. Also, is there any way to bypass the UAC from prompting the logged in user to allow installation to continue? Finally, how can I copy the configuration of an already installed ultravnc to future installations?