|
Something seems amiss here. I dummied up a project with VS2008 and your code seems to do what is expected.
CONTROL "",IDC_LIST1,"SysListView32",LVS_REPORT | LVS_SHOWSELALWAYS | LVS_ALIGNLEFT | WS_BORDER | WS_TABSTOP,14,15,278,153
...
BOOL CTempDlg::OnInitDialog()
{
CDialog::OnInitDialog();
m_PositionListBox.InsertColumn(0, _T("Name"), LVCFMT_LEFT, 100);
m_PositionListBox.InsertItem(0, _T("Ford"));
m_PositionListBox.InsertItem(1, _T("Chevrolet"));
m_PositionListBox.InsertItem(2, _T("Honda"));
m_PositionListBox.InsertItem(3, _T("Toyota"));
m_PositionListBox.InsertItem(4, _T("GMC"));
m_PositionListBox.InsertItem(5, _T("Jeep"));
return TRUE;
}
...
void CTempDlg::OnBnClickedSet()
{
int nItem = 3;
m_PositionListBox.SetFocus();
m_PositionListBox.SetItemState(nItem, LVIS_SELECTED, LVIS_SELECTED);
}When I click the Set button, item #3 (Toyota) is selected (blue). If I then press the Tab key, focus goes to the OK button but item #3 stays selected (gray).
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
modified 10-Aug-18 9:43am.
|
|
|
|
|
THanks, I will bake a dummy project on my side either, see if there's something different.
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
|
I've got it working with
m_PositionListBox.SetItemState(-1, 0, LVIS_SELECTED| LVIS_FOCUSED);
m_PositionListBox.SetItemState(currentStep - 1, LVIS_SELECTED| LVIS_FOCUSED, LVIS_SELECTED| LVIS_FOCUSED);
Thanks.
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
|
I want to use recursive descent algorithm to compute an arithmetical expression, but I can't get the right value,so please tell me how to write the code
here is my grammar
E→E+T|E-T|T
T→T*F| T/F|F
F→(E)|i
the following is my code
<pre>
#include<stdio.h>
#include<string>
using namespace std;
int pos = 0;
string str = "1+2*3-4";
double E();
double T();
double F();
int main() {
double v = E();
printf("%f", v);
getchar();
return 0;
}
double E() {
double v = 0;
char c = str.at(pos);
if (c == '+') {
pos++;
v = E() + T();
}
else if (c == '-') {
pos++;
v = E() - T();
}
else {
pos++;
v = T();
}
return v;
}
double T() {
double v = 0;
char c = str.at(pos);
if (c == '*') {
pos++;
v = T() * F();
}
else if (c == '/') {
pos++;
v = T() / F();
}
else {
pos++;
v = F();
}
return v;
}
double F() {
char c = str.at(pos);
if (c == '(') {
pos++;
double v = E();
c = str.at(pos);
if (c == ')') {
pos++;
return v;
}
}
else {
string s = "";
while (true) {
c = str.at(pos);
if (c >= '0' && c <= '9') {
s += c;
pos++;
}
else {
break;
}
}
return atoi(s.c_str());
}
return 0;
}
modified 9-Aug-18 2:57am.
|
|
|
|
|
You are not checking for '-':
if (c == '+') {
pos++;
v = E() + T();
}
else if (c == '+') { pos++;
v = E() - T();
}
You are also incrementing the value of pos if the operator is not one of the two you test for. So when you call the next function it will see the next character rather than the current one. You could improve this by replacing all these functions with a single switch block.
|
|
|
|
|
The logic in your parse functions is flawed: it first looks for the operator, and only then looks for the arguments. This would only work for an expression like "+ 1 2" rather than "1 + 2".
You have to change your code to first split it into tokens and then check the second (and maybe following) token(s) of the remaining part of your expression string for operators, before passing the first token(s) and the rest of the tokens (after the operator) on to the next recursion step.
P.S.: It is always a bad idea to use global variables in a program. But it is especially devastating when using recursive functions! I don't see any reasonable way to implement E(), T() and F() without passing the part of the string that needs to be analyzed. The advantage is that you don't need to split the whole string into tokens up front as I suggested at first. Instead each function just searches its part of the string for the operators that it can interpret, extract the arguments of that operator accordingly, and pass those into further recursive calls.
P.P.S.: example for function E():
double E (const std::string& str) {
size_t op_pos = str.find_first_of("+-", 1); if (op_pos == std::string::npos) { return T(str);
}
std::string first_operand = str.substr(0, op_pos);
std::string second_operand = str.substr(op_pos+1);
return (str.at(op_pos) == '+')
? E(first_operand) + T(second_operand)
: E(first_operand) - T(second_operand)
}
GOTOs are a bit like wire coat hangers: they tend to breed in the darkness, such that where there once were few, eventually there are many, and the program's architecture collapses beneath them. (Fran Poretto)
modified 9-Aug-18 4:43am.
|
|
|
|
|
Have you seen this?
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
In my MFC application i am reading and MDB file using CCommand as follows:
CDBPropSet cdbPropset;
CCommand <CAccessor<CMyClass>, CRowset> cCommand;
cdbPropset.AddProperty(DBPROP_CANSCROLLBACKWARDS, true);
cCommand.Open(m_pSessionManager->m_Session, csSQLQuery);
hr = cCommand.MoveFirst();
hr = cCommand.MovePrev();
In above code MovePrev() always throwing 265926 error code which is End Of RowsSet.
Can any on let me know whats wrong in my code.? Why record is not moving to previous row?
Thanks for the help.
modified 8-Aug-18 2:40am.
|
|
|
|
|
You call MoveFirst() which sets the pointer to the first record. A following call to MovePrev() will of course fail with DB_S_ENDOFROWSET because the pointer is already at the first position which is the end of the row set for backward scrolling operations.
I can't help further without knowing what you finally want to achieve (why do you want to scroll backwards). But moving backwards when already at the first position makes no sense.
|
|
|
|
|
I am inserting some values in MDB.
Lets say, after inserting 10 values, the pointer will be at 11 row since every time after inserting i will call movenext(). Now while inserting 11th value, i want to go to 10th row and delete the value in 10th row for which i need to call moveprev().
modified 12-Aug-18 7:35am.
|
|
|
|
|
This was not really clear from your question. To know what happens you should at least show some example lines. Note also that the behaviour depends on the used cursor type.
A common method to identify rows that has been inserted is using bookmarks which can be used later to select the row.
Maybe you should also rethink your design because inserting a row and deleting it within the same session makes no sense. Your code should detect that in advance so that there is no need to insert that row at all.
|
|
|
|
|
That was just an example i have given but not the exact requirement. But at any cost i want to perform this MovePrev() operation once at the end for my project requirement. But some how its failing (returning error code) even after setting the property on CBPropSet.
CDBPropSet cdbPropset(DBPROPSET_ROWSET);
cdbPropset.AddProperty(DBPROP_CANSCROLLBACKWARDS, true);
CCommand <CAccessor<CLabelsAccessor>,CRowset> cCommand;
hr = cCommand.Open(m_Session, csSQLQuery, &cdbPropset);
if( SUCCEEDED( hr ) )
{
hr = cCommand.MoveFirst();
for(int i = 0; i < 3; i++)
{
cCommand.m_labelvalueindex = 1;
cCommand.m_labellinenumber = 2;
hr = cCommand.Insert();
hr = cCommand.MoveNext();
}
cCommand.Close();
}
After the for loop i just want to perform Moveprev(). Can you tell me any wrong in above code.?
|
|
|
|
|
As already noted: Use bookmarks (see Using Bookmarks[^]).
Set the bookmark when at the position you want to access later where you can then use MoveToBookmark().
|
|
|
|
|
Since my command class is CRowSet, there is no SetBookMark() method on it.
|
|
|
|
|
It is a CAccessor member.
|
|
|
|
|
Small correction in my question. The error code is -2147217837.
|
|
|
|
|
Sampath579 wrote: Can you tell me any wrong in above code.?
Is there a need to call MoveNext()? The for() loop is just inserting 3 rows, correct?
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
|
|
|
|
|
If I don't call the movenext then pointer will be at one row and the data may overwrite.
In my requirement I want to moveprev one step and delete it.
|
|
|
|
|
Sampath579 wrote: If I don't call the movenext then pointer will be at one row and the data may overwrite.
How have you verified this?
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
|
|
|
|
|
I believe Jochen was spot on with his very first remark. The documentation of CRowset::MoveFirst | Microsoft Docs[^] clearly states that
Quote: Calls IRowset::RestartPosition to reposition the next-fetch location to the initial position (the position that was the next-fetch location when the rowset was created) and retrieves the initial row.
(emphasis mine)
In other words, your next Fetch would return the initial row at that time, no matter how many changes you made to the table in between the Move and the Fetch!
Looks like you should trust your error message and change your code accordingly.
P.S.: I just realized that it may still be considered ambiguous. However, you have to consider if (or why) the insertion of rows should affect the current Fetch position. The Insert command documentation does not indicate that it affects the Fetch position. If it would, shouldn't it say as much?
GOTOs are a bit like wire coat hangers: they tend to breed in the darkness, such that where there once were few, eventually there are many, and the program's architecture collapses beneath them. (Fran Poretto)
|
|
|
|
|
It does not work. Any other way of moving to previous record. MovePrev() throwing -2147217837 error code.
I definitely need to go and get the data from MovePrev().
|
|
|
|
|
My google-fu is lacking this morning.
I'm looking for a simple green/red (pass/fail) led indicator that I can "drop" in a MFC dialog ?
Any suggestion ?
(I could bake one, but feeling lazy, and it might not look as pretty)
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
|
Maximilien wrote: I'm looking for a simple green/red (pass/fail) led indicator that I can "drop" in a MFC dialog ?
Any suggestion ?
Just create them both (green/red led indicator icons) in the image editor!
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
