Does anyone know if there are any issues installing/running VB5 on Windows 10? Every time I try and Google this I only find articles relating to VB6.
I have an old legacy program in VB5 I need to maintain (until I finally get round to rewriting it in .NET... or, should I say, the client finally decides to pay me to...)
Sorry if this si impertinent, to ask a follow-up question like this, but I wonder if you mght know this:
The difficulty with installing W10 in a VM is that it won't recognise it as a free upgrade from my W7, so will ask for a product key - which I don't have (or would need to buy.) But it occurs to me that I could instead go for the W10 upgrade and then, if necessary, re-install W7 in a VM on the same machine... the querstion then is: would it let me? Or would it tell me that the W7 product key has akready been used? As it'd be the same physical machine perhaps it would... but being a VM, maybe it won't... i.e. can one re-use a Windows product key on a VM on the same box as the orginal OS was installed?
Although legacy codes do run on Windows for sake of backward compatibility. But why would you even want to use such an old language on a new platform?
You may want to upgrade your current application to Windows Runtime. Windows Runtime and .NET framework are separate, Windows Runtime is the native framework provided with Windows 10, where as .NET framework is a separate product that you install.
Read this API[^] for Visual Basic on Windows Runtime.
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
As I said, it's an old application I wrote for a client way back in the early 90's which I still need to maintain occassionally. It was originally written in VB3, but apart form a minor update to VB5 in the mid 90's has remined pretty much teh same, and is still in use to day - a fact I am ever so slightly proud of Of course it should be rewritten for a modern OS, but it's no small task, and the client likes it as is, so there is a certain amount of "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" going on. It will have to eb done day, but in the meantime....
I think the coder is the one who wants to switch in this case, and the IDE's compatibility is the primary concern. That client doesn't particularly sound like the sort of person who's likely to have ever ventured beyond windows XP.
The coder is heading for problems; an unsupported IDE on an OS that was created years later. It is not just that it will be a 32-bit environment in a 64-bit OS, there will be more recent versions of COM-controls, something VB leans on. Those would be different on XP, generating a error if not compiled on XP.
"Unsupported" really means it could stop working tomorrow. It is never a good strategy to build on something that can be gone tomorrow.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
Yes, you're right, and I realise this - but it's a large job to re-write the code, and I don't feel like doing it for free. So until the client is prepared to fork out for it, we'll just have to struggle on with the current code. As the earlier poster pointed out, this client is a tech dinosaur... I have pointed out to them the dangers of the path they are currently on.