|
Tactile versus visual? Objective versus subjective?
Large, fluffy, red ... The label also says Large (L); but makes no reference to fluffy or red; though fluffy might be implied in the material and washing instructions. "Non-white" is implied if told to wash separately with like colors.
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
modified 23hrs ago.
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: As I was lay awake this morning
In terms of two people speaking to each other...
The real value is in the word 'trapped'. The rest provides only limited value in the context to the other person. After all for example if it was small versus large would that really change anything?
But if I was the other person I would be more curious as to why you were laying in bed wearing a sweater like that in the first place. And if you were not in fact wearing it then why were you thinking about it in the first place.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm guessing you've never lain awake in the morning. Hmm?
|
|
|
|
|
Whatever order sounds most like a band name is correct.
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
Oddly enough, I had Soft, White Underbelly on my mind yesterday. 
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: I'm trapped inside a large, red, fluffy sweater ...
On a cold, dark, winter evening, with my soft, furry, ginger cat 😺 on my lap.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think it depends on what the word "fluffy" is describing.
If it's related to material, then it's a large red fluffy sweater. It's made of something fluffy, but it could be wool, cotton, nylon, etc. It could also simply be referring the class of objects known as "fluffy sweaters".I've got a large red fluffy sweater and a small green fluffy sweater. In this case, dropping the "large", I could still say "a red fluffy sweater"!
If it's the shape, then it's a large fluffy red sweater.I've got a large fluffy red sweater and a small furry green sweater. If it's opinion, then it's a fluffy large red sweater. This use would indicate the speaker is emphasizing the fluffiness."Is this a nice large red sweater?"
"Well, it's definitely a fluffy large red sweater!" Of course, rules are made to be broken, so the size-color order can be overridden if you're specifically referring to "large sweaters".I've several large sweaters, but my green large sweater is being washed, so I'll wear my fluffy red large sweater.
modified 15hrs ago.
|
|
|
|
|
|
At least you are keeping the indefinite article.
Leaving out definite or indefinite article from sentences gets my goat 
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|
|
It's definitely an article of clothing.
|
|
|
|
|
I think that would be "indefinitely".
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|
|
For an indefinite period, sure. Maybe only until the asteroid hits.
|
|
|
|
|
I saw this quote in the comments on an article about "AI" failing an IQ test:
Considering what actual stupidity has brought us to, I'm not at all cheered by the idea that now we’re going to add in artificial stupidity with a lot of money behind it.
|
|
|
|
|
That's how it gets you, playing dumb while keeping track of everything. At some point in the future WHAM! we're all slaves to the artificial overmind.
Maybe the Terminator movies got it right? Maybe there is no avoiding SkyNet?
|
|
|
|
|
It's the time of the year when music stream send you your yearly summary.
My top 7 artists :
Pete Namlook
Marillion.
ABBA (because of the Mama Mia! soundtrack)
Atom(tm)
Heilung
Genesis
Moby
And a crap ton of other artists.
CI/CD = Continuous Impediment/Continuous Despair
|
|
|
|
|
I thought you were going to tell us you mastered the guitar or something.
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
|
|
|
|
|
My report was:
The Warning
The Pretty Reckless
Wet Leg
Faun
Battlesnake
But this doesn't reflect what I listened to on YouTube and my ripped CDs which I listen to more often. It would be cool (Ok unpopular) if the stats could be compiled from all sources.
// TODO: Insert something here Top ten reasons why I'm lazy
1.
|
|
|
|
|
I've been in the top 0.5% listeners of Arch Enemy 
My top 5 artists were:
1) Arch Enemy
2) Epica
3) Gloryhammer
4) Amon Amarth
5) Children of Bodom
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
The shortest horror story: On Error Resume Next
|
|
|
|
|
Maximilien wrote: Moby
Met him once. Seemed like an alright guy. Was cool and down to earth. I asked him for the time. He gave it to me.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Mine:
UserNotFoundException
None of the streamers have anything on me. It works to our mutual benefit.
|
|
|
|
|
good for you.
soo... what music have you been listening to this year ?
CI/CD = Continuous Impediment/Continuous Despair
|
|
|
|
|
Maximilien wrote: soo... what music have you been listening to this year ?
I wouldn't bother trying to summarize it, because I don't collect such data as I have no interest in datamining my own listening habits. Why? Because I'm not trying to find emerging trends and identify patterns, and thus make recommendations for other things I might spend money on[*].
[*] For those selling content, that would be selling me CDs or (god forbid) MP3 or FLAC files. For streamers (selling subscriptions to content), that would be to try to keep me on as long as possible as a paying, captive audience. To which I say, I'll make my own spending decisions without anyone's help, thank you very much.
In other words - that's nobody's business, especially those who have a vested interest in making money based on what they know think I like.
Yes, I kinda have issues with those trying to sell me stuff, especially when it's not solicited. I'm sick to death of ads. I don't like to be analyzed, processed, catalogued, put in a box and being part of anyone's demographics.
Nothing against your question -- I'm just making a point that probably goes faaaar beyond your intent. I'm really not that much of a jackass (despite all appearances). 
|
|
|
|
|
Wow! I'll bet you're the life of the party... 
|
|
|
|
|
Why are people up in arms about Google, Facebook, Microsoft, etc collecting your data but services such as these get a free pass? I don't see the difference.
And to answer your question - I'm am the guy who warns others, at those parties you mention, about using those services. And my stance is, use them if you want. Just understand you own nothing, and when they go away, you'll have nothing to show for whatever money you spent with them.
[Edit]
Then those people roll their eyes and walk away.
Then later they come back to me asking to explain why things like this happen.
modified 19hrs ago.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
