Welcome to the Lounge

megaadam1-Jul-23 23:21

megaadam

1-Jul-23 23:21

honey the codewitch wrote:
just bit it

That must've been a first, right?

"If we don't change direction, we'll end up where we're going"

obermd2-Jul-23 5:06

obermd

2-Jul-23 5:06

I'm not a twit (twitter user), but this sounds like an attempt to reduce bot activity that went wrong. When Musk bought Twitter the best non-Twitter party line estimates for bot activity were anywhere from 70 to 95% of all tweets. These estimates were made by third party cyber security researchers, both in and out of the US government.

honey the codewitch2-Jul-23 5:09

2-Jul-23 5:09

A lot of those automated accounts, like those from the National Weather Service, were legitimate information sources. I'm not saying most of them. I wouldn't know, because they didn't account for that when they looked, which is my point.

This lockdown does not appear to prevent bots. Its purpose AFAICT was to try to entice people to join twitter.

It blew up. Not only did it cause massive outages as they made the dramatic change to the software pretty much over night, but it's questionable whether it will even pay off.

A lot of casual twitter viewers I talk to are abandoning twitter altogether because of this. They lurked so they didn't have accounts, and don't want to create them.

Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch/gfx

fgs19632-Jul-23 5:59

2-Jul-23 5:59

Wait! So people who didn’t have accounts are “leaving” without creating accounts?

The horror! D'Oh! | :doh:

I think I agree with Slacker.

honey the codewitch2-Jul-23 6:01

2-Jul-23 6:01

The way it was rolled out is comical. I'm laughing at the piss poor planning and execution of it.

And the eventual failure of the decision as he drives traffic away (again)

Nobody seems to have a problem crapping on Microsoft here. Elon and Twitter are fair game.

Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch/gfx

fgs19632-Jul-23 6:30

2-Jul-23 6:30

Of course Twitter / Musk are fair game. Just like Microsoft. The difference is people here typically crap on Microsoft the corporation not Nadella (CEO) or Vanguard (largest shareholder) because it’s not personal for them. When it is, they don’t hide it.

Your problem with Musk is clearly personal. Not sure why you won’t admit it.

I fully admit my personal dislike of Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg (arrogant, hypocrites who got lucky - not the sage visionaries they claim to be).

Embrace your bias… its very freeing! Poke tongue | ;-P

honey the codewitch2-Jul-23 6:33

2-Jul-23 6:33

It's not personal. He's a public figure, and the reason I bring him up is he keeps making very stupid decisions very publicly. Who was behind the last Microsoft update that blew up the network stack? Do you even know? Was it the CEO's decision to roll out that update without it being ready? Probably not.

Elon Musk is not particularly bright. He's particularly rich. There's a difference and people often forget that.

I think you think this is a liberal/conservative thing.

It's not. It's an "idiotic public figure" thing.

Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch/gfx

fgs19632-Jul-23 6:36

2-Jul-23 6:36

Methinks thou dost protest too much… Laugh | :laugh:

honey the codewitch2-Jul-23 6:38

2-Jul-23 6:38

Or I'm simply explaining my position and intent because you made up a story about what it was. Could be that.

Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch/gfx

fgs19632-Jul-23 7:49

2-Jul-23 7:49

Could be. But if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck…

honey the codewitch2-Jul-23 7:49

2-Jul-23 7:49

Things tend to look like what people want them to look like.

Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch/gfx

jschell3-Jul-23 6:53

jschell

3-Jul-23 6:53

The difference of course is that Musk is personally driving these decisions. To be fair not sure anyone else is left that could drive them and would certainly not do it unless Musk approved.

fgs1963 wrote:
The difference is people here typically crap on Microsoft the corporation

The difference however is that at Microsoft other people, not just the CEO, made bad decisions. Matter of fact not sure lately CEOs at Microsoft have been making any specific functional decisions.

For example the CEO was probably involved in the decision to purchase Activision Blizzard but I doubt it was his idea.

Probably isn't even possible for the MS CEO to be involved in most of the company. There are just too many products/services.

theoldfool2-Jul-23 8:48

theoldfool

2-Jul-23 8:48

Well, if it is a mess, just stop paying for it.
Never signed up for it myself. I figured twitter was for twits. Smile | :)

>64
Some days the dragon wins. Suck it up.

When a great project gets neglected

Daniel Pfeffer2-Jul-23 11:07

Daniel Pfeffer

2-Jul-23 11:07

theoldfool wrote:
twitter was for twits.

Amen.

The only "social media" that I use are Signal (required for work), and WhatsApp (required to keep up-to-date with the extended family, and a few organizations). Anything else - fuggedaboutit!

Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.

honey the codewitch1-Jul-23 2:19

1-Jul-23 2:19

GitHub - memononen/nanosvg: Simple stupid SVG parser[^]

Someone made a small SVG parser, and I made several improvements to it.

It's perfect for rendering on IoT. I've gotten it to render on machines with a mere 192kB of SRAM with plenty to spare (I haven't tried on anything smaller because I don't currently own anything my graphics library will run on that is smaller.

Unfortunately, the project appears to be dead. It's not maintained. The author's blog hasn't been updated since 2012. The author's email comes back undeliverable. He's a ghost.

And yet, the project has 1.5k stars, making any fork of it probably such that maybe a dozen people will use it unless I get lucky.

For me to expend the effort - currently my improvements are in C++ but I'd need to backport them to C - I'd want it to be worthwhile, rather than live in the shadow of the older codebase in perpetuity.

So I really don't know that it worth it. At least my graphics library is open source, and people can use that to get my improvements (like some CSS support, and streaming)

Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch/gfx

Mike Hankey1-Jul-23 8:00

Mike Hankey

1-Jul-23 8:00

If you can't use it there's no point in expending the effort.

With that few people following it and it being dead that many years chances are it's a forgotten project.

Give me coffee to change the things I can and wine for those I can not!
PartsBin an Electronics Part Organizer - An updated version available! JaxCoder.com
Latest Article: Simon Says, A Child's Game

honey the codewitch1-Jul-23 8:25

1-Jul-23 8:25

Yeah, that's how I feel about it. It's just a shame is all. It's a great little offering.

Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch/gfx

Mike Hankey1-Jul-23 8:52

Mike Hankey

1-Jul-23 8:52

Yeah I know what you mean but, it is what it is!

Give me coffee to change the things I can and wine for those I can not!
PartsBin an Electronics Part Organizer - An updated version available! JaxCoder.com
Latest Article: Simon Says, A Child's Game

BillWoodruff1-Jul-23 9:48

BillWoodruff

1-Jul-23 9:48

Consider publishing a CP article with your improved code, and an acknowledgement of what's on GitHub.

«The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be kindled» Plutarch

honey the codewitch1-Jul-23 10:57

1-Jul-23 10:57

I would consider it if I understood the project better. It uses a derivative of the same rendering engine I use for my TrueType fonts, but I've never understood how it works. It's really dense C code where you find yourself in the weeds after about 3 minutes or so.

I feel like without fully understanding it, I couldn't do my readers justice.

Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch/gfx

Gerry Schmitz1-Jul-23 15:37

Gerry Schmitz

1-Jul-23 15:37

Neglect implies some sort of obligation on someone else's part. Sounds like the source is there. That's a "gift".

"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I

honey the codewitch1-Jul-23 16:05

1-Jul-23 16:05

I supposed "abandoned" may have been more accurate.

Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch/gfx

dandy722-Jul-23 4:55

dandy72

2-Jul-23 4:55

Is there an active fork of it?

honey the codewitch2-Jul-23 5:05

2-Jul-23 5:05

There are a lot of forks. I considered fishing, but I wasn't up to it at the time. I will probably pick it up when I need something to do. Smile | :)

Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch/gfx