|
Fixed an issue that could result in a player’s GTA Online experience being modified by a third party, including:
altering GTA$ balance, RP level, Bad Sport status, and other player stats
manipulation of players being kicked or crashed
We can play it again on PC! Whooo!
I've been getting withdrawal symptoms ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
modified 1hr ago.
|
|
|
|
|
image_slice = numpy_image[150:220, 130:250]
When slicing a numpy image, the bounds are inclusive and indexing starts from 1.
array_slice = array[0:2]
When slicing a Python array the end bound is exclusive and indexing starts from 0.
What could possibly go wrong?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Seems quite logical to me, Captain. 
|
|
|
|
|
This is why a language needs to be designed by a committee. 
|
|
|
|
|
Exactly the same with the functions in Transact-SQL. These people don't know their zeroes. You need to be careful in the Muggle World.
Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
VB's WithEvents is jealous.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
What languages, wishlists do you have for your favorite programming languages?
C and where applicable, C++:
preprocessor definitions that are private to the actual (in this case header) file they are contained in.
namespaces that are private to their header.
and/or a standard way to separate the implementation of templates into a cpp file
a way to predeclare templates (not template instantiations) such that you can access them before they are defined.
C#:
Mainly I want its code generation to have DSL (domain specific language) capabilities. This means you can create code generation facilities that introduce new keywords into the language, for doing things like AOP and cross-cutting functionality orthogonal to any specific class. The only problem with it is I think it would be overused.
To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.
|
|
|
|
|
Some of your desiderata can already be approximated in C++, at least.
honey the codewitch wrote: preprocessor definitions that are private to the actual (in this case header) file they are contained in.
With the exception of conditional compilation, I have little use for the preprocessor in C++. Defining an anonymous namespace inside a named namespace will allow scoping of C++ (not preprocessor) definitions even in a header file.
honey the codewitch wrote: namespaces that are private to their header.
You already have something close to this in C++ - define a namespace in the header with an anonymous internal namespace. Only functions declared in the (named) namespace may access the definitions in the anonymous namespace.
namespace foo
{
namespace
{
int bar();
}
}
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
How did I not know about that?
Thanks!
To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: you can create code generation facilities that introduce new keywords into the language
This will be a nightmare for code maintenance. It's hard enough keeping code sensible so that any dev can step in and understand and safely maintain it, what with all the syntactic sugar being added. Allowing this to be non-standard and ad-hoc will just massively increase the surface area of confusion.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
In C# and C++ an "in" and "!in" operators. For example, if we have"
if(var1 == param1 || var1 == param2 || !(var1 == param3))
{
}
to be able to translate to:
if(var1 in (param1, param2, !param3))
{
}
Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.
|
|
|
|
|
And an isnt operator, to avoid !( x is y ) ?
|
|
|
|
|
Can we also have the redneck version called aint ?
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
How about the "aint not" operator?
(Hillbilly?)
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Pfeffer wrote: How about the "aint not" operator?
That would be t'aint
PartsBin an Electronics Part Organizer - An updated version available!
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
and for set inclusion, the all_yall function.
"They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers! Can I get an amen?"
|
|
|
|
|
You totally read my mind.
I want this. I need this.
if (var1 in all yall (param1, param2, !param3)) {
}
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
for (hold_my_bear in watch_this)
{
}
PartsBin an Electronics Part Organizer - An updated version available!
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
Well, let's not, else we may wind up with multiple inheritance problems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: What languages, wishlists do you have for your favorite programming languages? My daily drivers are TypeScript/ECMAScript (JavaScript). Since JS is now governed by ECMA, having a committee behind it is a great thing for helping the language to continue to mature in a reasonable way. So, my wish has been answered.
But, if I had to pick a wish-list for this ecosystem, it's less to do with the language and more to do with the developers. Despite this ecosystem finally starting to grow up, there are 10,000 packages to clip your toenails, for instance, and 99% of them aren't worth much. And despite the efforts of the language itself growing, due to the enormous popularity of JavaScript, there are still a ton of folks who pretend to know the language but are just script kiddies.
For those wondering why I didn't say something like TypeScript to WASM compilation.... there's already a project that does that with a subset of TS suitable for this.
Jeremy Falcon
modified 4hrs 20mins ago.
|
|
|
|
|
C# -- Multiple inheritance.
And a C-Preprocessor which is more flexible, for use with things other than vanilla C.
I've wanted this since doing PRO*C back in the 90s.
|
|
|
|
|
Early growth key that is bird (6)
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well-preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming “Wow! What a Ride!" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Early growth = BUD
Key = G
That is = IE
Bird = BUDGIE
|
|
|
|