|
It's all relative. Can you at least admit that much?
|
|
|
|
|
dandy72 wrote: It's all relative. Can you at least admit that much? |
what do you mean by relative?
|
|
|
|
|
OMG. Is English not your native language?
"Hot" has a higher temperature than "cold".
"Black" is darker than "white".
"Having an arrest expunged" is better than "having been convicted of a crime but then pardoned".
That's how it's relative.
|
|
|
|
|
You are just arguing always the same.
I have already told it several times: Go and ask for a background check yourself.
If you were not convicted there should not be anything in the report. If the report is empty, just STFU and don't tell anything about it.
You have even been said by several professionals in several different countries (even your own) that even if the report wasn't empty it shouldn't be a problem if you have the correct skill set. YOU are making it a problem.
EDIT:
As I start to think you really are just a forum troll, this is going to be my last message in this thread if you don't prove me wrong.
I wish you good luck in your life and that you manage to find the job you deserve and fits you best.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: I have already told it several times: Go and ask for a background check yourself.
I ran a background check on myself and nothing showed up, but is that suppose to make a difference? of course not.
|
|
|
|
|
Pity... I did actually hope you would prove me wrong.
Farewell and good luck in your live 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Then why do you keep whining about a "record"?
You're a troll.
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
|
|
|
|
|
Gerry Schmitz wrote: You're a troll.
once again you can believe whatever you want to believe. I came here looking "help" i guess you can say and maybe some "guidance" but I get is bs answers. At the end of the day whether its a non conviction or a conviction a expunged arrest or not i still have a record at the end of the day and my life is pretty much over at this point.
|
|
|
|
|
I have a record too: some 45's and some LP's. But I don't whine about it.
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
|
|
|
|
|
Gerry Schmitz wrote: I have a record too: some 45's and some LP's. But I don't whine about it.
well good for you? idk what a 45 and a LP means anyways
|
|
|
|
|
That explains everything; come back when you grow up.
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
|
|
|
|
|
Gerry Schmitz wrote: That explains everything;
actually no it doesn't. As i said I live here in America and I see you live in Canada. I never heard of anything called a 45 or an LP so try again smartass.
|
|
|
|
|
it actually doesnt i really dont know what that means cause as i said im in the US and i see that you're in Canada. I dont know what 45 or LP means.
|
|
|
|
|
Gerry Schmitz wrote: That explains everything; come back when you grow up.
Exactly what I expected his response to be. Did not disappoint.
|
|
|
|
|
also again that doesn't explain anything. I looked up what both a 45 and LP is and it has nothing to do with programming whatsoever.
|
|
|
|
|
They're "records" ... it was a "joke". And about as relevant as your non-existent one.
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
|
|
|
|
|
non-existent? easy for you to say. I heard too many things about this from too many people. So all I'm gonna say is people saying its "non existent" or theres nothing there is complete bs.
|
|
|
|
|
Depending where you live, no.
A freelancer is an unprotected one man company. No insurance unless you buy them. You need to be sure to turn a profit, or back out. For most, it is a bad idea.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Well to be honest I rather be a freelancer than to try to get a job with a company when 9/10 its not gonna happen now.
|
|
|
|
|
Write finally near the end. (13)
|
|
|
|
|
Write PEN
finally ULTIMATELY
near the end.
PENULTIMATELY
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I did not think that would last long... well done.
|
|
|
|
|
I initially thought you'd miscounted and it was 11, not 13! 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
After 20 years I'm finally catching up with the Sopranos. I usually manage to follow the plot but there's one thing that's got me stumped and I know that someone here will know the answer. 
In S4 E2, Christopher Moltisanti has been appointed as acting captain of Paulie Gualtieri's crew (while Paulie is away) and Silvio Dante disapproves of this appointment. The crew have no-show/no-work jobs on a major building site. Tony has ordered that thefts from the building site must NOT occur as the project is of great value to the family (and to the family's reputation with one of the New York families with whom it is a joint project).
However, Silvio authorises one of the Gualtieri crew, Patsy Parisi, who feels passed over for command, to steal some valuable floor tiles from the site. Silvio does this despite knowing that it will anger Tony. Afterwards, Silvio goes to Tony and claims that it was a misunderstanding and agrees to pay back the value of the tiles, $30K.
So why did Silvio do this? He knew it would anger Tony. He chose to repay their value rather than order Patsy to return them. I presume that he did it to undermine Christopher in the eyes of Paulie's crew but it seems a rather feeble way to do it. It couldn't have been to undermine Christopher in the eyes of Tony since Tony knew it was Silvio who disobeyed his orders. Silvio is normally very loyal to Tony so was Silvio trying to make a (vague) point to Tony?
Were the writers having a poor week or have I missed a subtlety here?
Go on, impress me with your Sopranos knowledge.
|
|
|
|
|
markrlondon wrote: impress me with your Sopranos knowledge.
Maria Callas's voice was sublime. 
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
