|
Interesting thoughts, thanks for taking the time.
trønderen wrote: 'Comics' is sometimes used to describe animated movies as well.
Agreed with that too, and it's really a misnomer. The Marvel movies are based on "comics", but clearly, there's nothing comical about the stories they're trying to tell. OTOH, don't get me started with the term "graphic novel"... 
|
|
|
|
|
Peanuts never was a "comic strip", in the sense of "funny". It was more a graphic (in the sense of graphic novel) soap opera.
Ditto for Garfield.
Both Peanuts and Garfield have occasional funny strips, but that is not their intent.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Peanuts as a comic is a form of satire.
Funny sometimes, but unfortunately it's a deadly allergy.
Now Dilbert, is funny and insightful.
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
jmaida wrote: Now Dilbert, is funny and insightful.
Sometimes Dilbert can best be described as a documentary.
|
|
|
|
|
Peanuts was elementary school angst; with Snoopy side trips; and the question of whether Lucy would ever let Charlie kick the football.
Garfield's attraction is the "grumpy cat" image. (e.g. merchandise)
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
|
|
|
|
|
Gerry Schmitz wrote: Garfield's attraction is the "grumpy cat" image. (e.g. merchandise)
Grumpy cat, predating Grumpy Cat himself. Never thought of it that way...
|
|
|
|
|
Evidently you were one of the Cool Kids. Charlie Brown and his friends was drawn and written for those of us that were not.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Gary R. Wheeler wrote: Evidently you were one of the Cool Kids.
LMAO.
Trust me, nobody's ever made the mistake of giving me that label.
|
|
|
|
|
hello! is it possible to create something like node-red on c#. Thank's.🤔
modified 26-Nov-22 8:50am.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, all things are possible.
|
|
|
|
|
but how! i need same helps.
|
|
|
|
|
Then you need to start by thinking seriously about what help you need, and formulating a detailed question. And technical questions should be posted in the proper forum at https://www.codeproject.com/Questions/ask.aspx[^]. But if your question is simply, "how do I do it", I am afraid you are in the wrong place.
|
|
|
|
|
All you really need to know is that the data bits are flexed through a collectimizer which strips the flow-gate arrays into virtual message elements. Everything else stems naturally from there.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
The Collectimizer, naturally of course.
|
|
|
|
|
It probably just slipped your mind. You'd have got there soon enough - but it is a Saturday, of course!
The original[^]
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Unless you've studied your Agrippa.
|
|
|
|
|
Should be trivial. You just need a roll of duct tape.
Oh wait. That’s a node red-green. Never mind!
If you can't laugh at yourself - ask me and I will do it for you.
|
|
|
|
|
winrond wrote: is it possible to create something like node-red on c#.
I would say no.
Node-RED[^]
Primary problem is this...
"It provides a browser-based editor"
So by implication that means the standard browsers like Chrome, Firefox and Edge.
To run C# in any of those you are going to need to actually start the process that runs it in the first place.
So consider the following...
Web Development - C# in the Browser with Blazor | Microsoft Learn[^]
So seems perfect right? But there are two problems with that.
First how are you going to invoke that in the first place, in the browser, using only C#? So not html, no javascript, etc. Example in the above uses HTML.
Second looks like it is not actually serving up C# (or dlls) but rather a specialized compiled and perhaps restricted form of C#. Although that is probably debatable.
|
|
|
|
|
This new electric automobile power technology link below seems amazing. Liquid fuel cheaper than gas. Quick refill from ordinary pump stations. Long Range. Environmentally friendly to manufacture and "burn" fuel. Why drive anything else. Problem Solved!
nanoFlowcell - Mobility - Cars & Transport[^]
PS Imho Musk should have purchased 4 next generation space telescopes instead of Twitter He would go down in history as a great benefactor of science instead of the fool who sent many people to their deaths on Mars
modified 26-Nov-22 1:52am.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Page Not Found
The page you are looking for doesn't exist or has been moved
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for update Replaced link w/ new which works for now
|
|
|
|
|
BernardIE5317 wrote: He would go down in history as a great benefactor of science
Maybe that's not what he's aspiring to do?
BernardIE5317 wrote: the fool who sent many people to their deaths on Mars
When did that happen?
|
|
|
|
|
[0] Apparently not. No doubt you are correct. Just imagine the great contribution to science if he did as I understand NASA is struggling to fund even one Next Generation Telescope
[1] In 100y
|
|
|
|
|
BernardIE5317 wrote: [1] In 100y
So not only are you blaming him for something he hasn't yet done, but it'll be done at a time when even himself will have been dead for decades?
Not that I'm defending the guy.
|
|
|
|
|
The descriptions of the
bi-ION® molecule
are very vague
Zero white papers are mentioned.
Zero patents [bi-ION] are mentioned. Older patents for solar technology are mentioned though.
Searching for news, outside their own website, there are few, after 2017 from major outlets.
Sorry. For me this sounds like another Theranos.
"If we don't change direction, we'll end up where we're going"
|
|
|
|