|
A simple idea: fill a plastic box with quick cement and put the PVC pipe in it. 
|
|
|
|
|
thank you kindly . interesting idea . however i wish the setup to be disassemblible and need to place it atop the FM receiver so prefer not too heavy . thank you again
|
|
|
|
|
|
interesting suggestion especially the height i.e. 9ft, thank you kindly . am not sure how to place antenna atop i.e. to wit SR-100 FM Antenna[^] thank you again , will look for other stands of similar height
|
|
|
|
|
A mix of what already has been said:
If your PVC pipe offers you a good place to put your antenna, use it. Just make a wood tripod (or quadpod), where you can have 2, 3 or 4 horizontal boards with a hole slightly bigger than you PVC to help supporting the side forces when wind hits your antenna, the tripod legs fixed to a wider broad on the base, and that board fixed mecanically with the best option to your roof. There are some special waterproof dowels that would avoid to have water coming into your roof.
Similar to oil prospection towers: Pic[^] but in small
For the 1 meter length I would do at least 3 probably 4 horizontal boards (top, base and 2 in between)
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 4-Jun-23 5:30am.
|
|
|
|
|
put it on a shelf instead?
|
|
|
|
|
|
And even those might have difficult times depending how strong is the wind over there.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
thank you kindly . interestng idea . not too expensive and i imagine something like one of those as a base and a 1meter long pvc of 2inch inner diameter slips right over the mast and another such mast slips right into the top of the pvc and the antenna placed atop it i.e. its' bottom . thank you again
|
|
|
|
|
You need to incorporate a pvc flange into your project; and maybe a clamp if you're up against another structure.
https://flexpvc.com/cart/agora.cgi?p_id=&product=PVC-Fittings-Flanges-Mounting
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
|
|
|
|
|
Super ! thank you kindly . that is just what i was hoping to find but could not at Lowe's site . thanks again . good prices too !
|
|
|
|
|
epoxy may work, but i think ideally you'd cut a channel in the plastic to fit the pvc into. Then use the epoxy. Given the equipment, like a router, that's what I would probably attempt.
Edit: never mind, Gerry has the right answer.
There's smoke in my iris
But I painted a sunny day on the insides of my eyelids
So I'm ready now (What you ready for?)
I'm ready for life in this city
And my wings have grown almost enough to lift me
|
|
|
|
|
I would recommend using a T-connector with the 'axis' connecting to the base with u-bolts and the long end to the antenna. In addition to only needing stock parts/glue, you get an adjustable base.
Also, PVC can become quite flexible when heated to the appropriate temperature...if you find you want to create custom fittings or reshape the thing. Good luck!
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
"Hope is contagious"
|
|
|
|
|
You may not need to glue pipe to T-connector.
The pipe can just sit upright in it.
attach t-connector to 1ftx1ftx 1/4inch piece of plywood or plastic.
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
I recommend a glue especially made for PVC.
You could try brazing if you're adventurous.
Welding could be interesting.
CQ de W5ALT
Walt Fair, Jr.PhD P. E.
Comport Computing
Specializing in Technical Engineering Software
|
|
|
|
|
PVC pipe, adapter, and floor flange, all schedule 40. Cement the pipe to the adapter with PVC cement (it will not come apart). Screw the adapter into the flange (do not overtighten). Attach the flange to your base with screws. Now affix your antenna.
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
|
|
|
|
|
BernardIE5317 wrote: PVC pipe of length 1m to a flat base of hard plastic so it stands vertically to support an indoor FM antenna on the top .
Just noting that I could not find an indoor antenna which was even close to that length. Even many of the outdoor ones were shorter than that.
I did find a 'Pixel Technologies AFHD-4 AM FM HD Radio Antenna'. Outdoor only. Which would be about 1.5 meters.
Have you tried just hooking up a piece of wire and taping it to the wall? Certainly when I was young that is what I did for multiple residences. Wire and tape is real portable.
|
|
|
|
|
thank you kindly for investigating . the 1m does not refer to antenna . i have an antenna in mind purchased and utilized i.e. SR-100 FM Antenna[^] . i found whilst utilizing it provides good reception if held aloft . so i need an extra "arm" hence the 1m stand/support . yes i also utilized a lengthy wire taped high on a nearby wall w/ poor results . -Kind Regards
|
|
|
|
|
You could fix a shorter dowel rod to the base via a screw and then slide the PVC over the dowel.
|
|
|
|
|
I just installed the beta of the new Chat version of GitHub Copilot and I've been using it for a couple of days.
I had this thought:
I wonder how long it will be before employers start using some version of Copilot (or whatever name they give it) to measure developers' performance?
It won't just be number of lines written anymore, it will be the quality of the code that gets measured.
Do you think that will happen?
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Andrew x64 wrote: It won't just be number of lines written anymore, it will be the quality of the code that gets measured. Can Co-Pilot really identify quality code or nasty bugs that get fixed with some letters or a couple lines but get a dev busy for some days / weeks? If not... then it won't be a good idea.
Additionally there are parts of the job that have nothing to do with code writing and can be time intensive too. Clarifying specs, talking with customers / providers, organisational things, creating the concept / structure...
Product owner, product designer, system architect and other similar roles are very difficult to evaluate using those kind of metrics.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: Product owner, product designer, system architect and other similar roles are very difficult to evaluate using those kind of metrics. Totally agree. That's what formed the basis of my question - just how unfair it would be.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
If it can count Function Points, and you keep track of how long it took to develop those points, then it can help with future estimating. And, yes, be able to say how many function points Programmer A delivers on average over a certain time frame.
Function point - Wikipedia
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Andrew x64 wrote: I wonder how long it will be before employers start using some version of Copilot (or whatever name they give it) to measure developers' performance?
Versus those that already attempted that using other tools/processes in the past decades?
Most companies have better things to do with their time. And most find it hard enough to hire developers, so annoying the ones that work there usually isn't something they want to get involved with.
|
|
|
|
|
I hope you're right.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|