Click here to Skip to main content
15,851,242 members

Welcome to the Lounge

   

For discussing anything related to a software developer's life but is not for programming questions. Got a programming question?

The Lounge is rated Safe For Work. If you're about to post something inappropriate for a shared office environment, then don't post it. No ads, no abuse, and no programming questions. Trolling, (political, climate, religious or whatever) will result in your account being removed.

 
GeneralRe: Wordle 900 Pin
Amarnath S5-Dec-23 14:43
professionalAmarnath S5-Dec-23 14:43 
GeneralRe: Wordle 900 Pin
Sandeep Mewara5-Dec-23 16:43
mveSandeep Mewara5-Dec-23 16:43 
GeneralRe: Wordle 900 Pin
Shane01035-Dec-23 18:10
Shane01035-Dec-23 18:10 
GeneralRe: Wordle 900 Pin
GKP19925-Dec-23 18:18
professionalGKP19925-Dec-23 18:18 
GeneralRe: Wordle 900 - 4 4 me Pin
pkfox5-Dec-23 21:59
professionalpkfox5-Dec-23 21:59 
GeneralRe: Wordle 900 Pin
ChandraRam5-Dec-23 22:01
ChandraRam5-Dec-23 22:01 
GeneralRe: Wordle 900 Pin
Cp-Coder6-Dec-23 9:39
Cp-Coder6-Dec-23 9:39 
GeneralRevisionism in journalism Pin
dandy725-Dec-23 10:26
dandy725-Dec-23 10:26 
I've been subscribed to the BBC World News RSS feed for years. Yes, RSS feeds are still a thing. I wouldn't have it any other way either, given that nobody places ads on those feeds (or perhaps rather, don't bother to, for some reason). But that's not the point.

I've been noticing for quite a while now that they'll often re-surface old articles - days, weeks, even months old - articles they've already published before, but republish them with updated bits and pieces - adjust some numbers, add some details that weren't there before, that sort of thing. Some of these (the same articles) show up repeatedly time and time again.

I never find these to be of particular interest (no matter what got updated), so I just delete these "new" entries that show up as unread at the bottom of the chronological list.

I really wonder who those updates are there for. RSS has fallen out of favor, so very few people should even notice. I can only assume that, among the population at large, only people searching for an article on a specific topic might find them, and read the latest version as if it were the first published instance (and really, how might one even know, unless they're marked as such, which they never are?) What's the point? After a while, if something's really worth bringing up again, doesn't it warrant having a brand new article written instead? If it's not, then presumably you're concluding people shouldn't care enough, so as a reporter, you should just let those old articles go...

I don't like to see history rewritten. If it has to do with fact-checking, or new details having come to light, I've seen newspapers publish follow-up articles, corrections as part of an addendum, that sort of thing. These online articles however don't get an addendum; the original gets modified and then passed off as if these were "as originally written".

I'm not sure whether this is common and other news sources do the same, as this is the only news feed I subscribe to. And they're the only ones who do it.

Anyone know anything about journalism that can shed some light as to what the real motive might be?

I'm sure I'm reading too much into this, as the topics in those revised articles are generally rather benign.
GeneralRe: Revisionism in journalism Pin
Richard MacCutchan5-Dec-23 10:37
mveRichard MacCutchan5-Dec-23 10:37 
GeneralRe: Revisionism in journalism Pin
MarkTJohnson5-Dec-23 11:46
professionalMarkTJohnson5-Dec-23 11:46 
GeneralRe: Revisionism in journalism Pin
trΓΈnderen5-Dec-23 12:54
trΓΈnderen5-Dec-23 12:54 
GeneralRe: Revisionism in journalism Pin
BernardIE53175-Dec-23 15:37
BernardIE53175-Dec-23 15:37 
GeneralRe: Revisionism in journalism Pin
trΓΈnderen6-Dec-23 2:50
trΓΈnderen6-Dec-23 2:50 
GeneralRe: Revisionism in journalism Pin
Amarnath S5-Dec-23 20:05
professionalAmarnath S5-Dec-23 20:05 
GeneralRe: Revisionism in journalism Pin
charlieg6-Dec-23 0:24
charlieg6-Dec-23 0:24 
GeneralRe: Revisionism in journalism Pin
dandy726-Dec-23 4:44
dandy726-Dec-23 4:44 
GeneralRe: Revisionism in journalism Pin
BobbyStrain5-Dec-23 18:47
BobbyStrain5-Dec-23 18:47 
GeneralRe: Revisionism in journalism Pin
dandy726-Dec-23 6:14
dandy726-Dec-23 6:14 
GeneralRe: Revisionism in journalism Pin
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter5-Dec-23 19:28
professionalKornfeld Eliyahu Peter5-Dec-23 19:28 
GeneralRe: Revisionism in journalism Pin
Daniel Pfeffer5-Dec-23 22:05
professionalDaniel Pfeffer5-Dec-23 22:05 
GeneralRe: Revisionism in journalism Pin
dandy726-Dec-23 4:30
dandy726-Dec-23 4:30 
GeneralRe: Revisionism in journalism Pin
inariy13-Dec-23 4:45
inariy13-Dec-23 4:45 
GeneralRe: Revisionism in journalism Pin
dandy7213-Dec-23 5:36
dandy7213-Dec-23 5:36 
RantClosedXML odd behavior Pin
kmoorevs5-Dec-23 9:31
kmoorevs5-Dec-23 9:31 
JokeRe: ClosedXML odd behavior Pin
Nelek5-Dec-23 9:33
protectorNelek5-Dec-23 9:33 

General General    News News    Suggestion Suggestion    Question Question    Bug Bug    Answer Answer    Joke Joke    Praise Praise    Rant Rant    Admin Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.