C / C++ / MFC

Re: What's the difference between function atof() and _tstof()?

21-Jun-08 7:20

It all depends if either _UNICODE or _MBCS are defined. Please check out MSDN for more information on this topic.

Regards,
Mihai Moga

Dan21-Jun-08 9:08

Dan

21-Jun-08 9:08

Thats the TCHAR mapping for atof/_wtof. By default vc2008 defines TCHAR as a native type. You can use it in vc6, you just need to do so explicitly.

Convert CString to double

bkelly1321-Jun-08 5:27

21-Jun-08 5:27

I am trying to figure out how to convert text in a CString to a double. I found this tutorial:
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/string/cstringmgmt.aspx#Converting%20a%20CString%20to%20an%20integer
and it contains this example code for converting to an integer

CString hex = _T("FAB");
CString decimal = _T("4011");
ASSERT(_tcstoul(hex, 0, 16) == _ttoi(decimal));

I don’t even see an integer declared in that fragment, much less how to convert the CString to an integer or decimal.

Here is what I need:

CString source = _T("1.2e6");
double target;
target = source.FormatAsDouble();

Obviously that does not work. But what will?

Thanks for your time

bkelly1321-Jun-08 5:30

21-Jun-08 5:30

Rats, I miss typed and the edit did not seem to work.
This is what I want to do:

CString source = _T("1.2e6");
double target;
target = source.FormatAsDouble();

Thanks for your time

Ștefan-Mihai MOGA21-Jun-08 5:33

21-Jun-08 5:33

Hi, you should try like this:

CString source = _T("1.2e6");
double target = _tstof( source );

Regards,
Mihai Moga

bkelly1321-Jun-08 5:42

21-Jun-08 5:42

I just compiled and ran that code, it works. But you already knew that.
Thank you Mihai.

The string to be converted will be extracted from a user dialog. The user may make an error in entering the number. Is there a method that will validate the string as being properly formatted or in some other way detect an input error to I can tell the user?

Thanks again.

Thanks for your time

Ștefan-Mihai MOGA21-Jun-08 5:47

21-Jun-08 5:47

Hi, for this task you should check out Ben Hanson's CFilterEdit[^] class. I use in one of my projects and I am gratefull to the author.

Regards,
Mihai Moga

bkelly1321-Jun-08 7:27

21-Jun-08 7:27

RE: CFileterEDit, That class does look good. I downloaded it and the demo.

The file BaseEdit.h contains this reference:

#include <boost/regex.hpp>

This include file in not contained in either of the downloads. BaseEDit.h is the only file containing this include and it has no previous includes that lead me to the file.

Where do I find this file?

Thanks for your time

Ștefan-Mihai MOGA21-Jun-08 7:42

21-Jun-08 7:42

In order to recompile that project, you should consider downloading the boost::regex library from Boost's Official Page/[^].

Regards,
Mihai Moga

bkelly1321-Jun-08 17:05

21-Jun-08 17:05

Hello Mahai,
I have installed the Boost environment, I have added FloatEdit and BaseEdit to my project, and they will compile. Now I see method
double CFloatEdit::GetValue () const
in file FloatEdit.cpp

But I don't see how to apply it to my dialog box.
One of the fields that I want filtered has the ID:
IDC_X_POSITION_EDIT
and string in the box can be accessed via the variable name as follows:
GBE_x_position_string.GetWindowTextW( str );
That puts the value into CString names str.

Can you tell me how to use this FloatEdit to check the inputs to this field?

Thanks for your time

Ștefan-Mihai MOGA21-Jun-08 21:18

21-Jun-08 21:18

Well, FloatEdit will do it for you, it filters data so that you would have a valid floating value/string. It's enought to subclass you CEdit control with this one.

Regards,
Mihai Moga

bkelly1322-Jun-08 3:44

22-Jun-08 3:44

Thanks for your reply, but while the documentation tells that than I can use this class to filter the data, I am not able to see how to apply the class to do that. How do I use it?

Given that the text edit tool in my dialog has the id of
IDC_X_POSITION_EDIT
and the assigned variable of
GBE_x_position_string
with example usage: GBE_x_position_string.GetWindowTextW( str );
and variable str containg the string from said edit text tool:

Will you show me the line of code that invokes a method of FloatEdit to
1. validate the string as suitable for converting to float or double
and/or
2. provide the foat or double equvalent.

Thanks for your time

CPallini21-Jun-08 5:48

21-Jun-08 5:48

Hint: atof returns 0.0 whenever the conversion fails.
Smile | :)

If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.

This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke

[My articles]

bkelly1321-Jun-08 5:51

21-Jun-08 5:51

But what if the value entered is 0.0. That may well be a valid entry. I could compare the source string with "0.0" to account for that one case, but that just seems ugly.

Thanks for your time

CPallini21-Jun-08 7:41

21-Jun-08 7:41

No it's NOT ugly and it is the way my suggestion pointed to. You have to deal only with 1 case and that's much more simpler than the general validation. Anyway you have to accomplish carefully your task. For instance 0 is a valid entry too (and, depending on your level of user-noise tolerance, also 0.00, 0.000,... are).
Smile | :)

bkelly1321-Jun-08 8:18

21-Jun-08 8:18

Hello Pallini,
I really do appreciate the time you spent answering my question. But we do disagree on something. Elegant is something like this.

CString source = "1.23e6";
double target;
int status;

status = source.ConvertToFloat( &target );

If atof returns 0.0 in the double variable for an error, this it must also write 0.0 to the variable when the text is 0, or 0.0, or any of several other conditions as you have noted. In this event, either before the convert or after, we must have additonal code to check for any text string that would result in 0.0 to determine if we have an error, or if we really have a 0. Having to writing extra code to do that is indeed downright ugly.

Maybe I have missunderstood you. If so please help me out.

Thanks for your time

CPallini22-Jun-08 1:42

Somebody voted me down for playing with you.

22-Jun-08 1:42

No, you haven't misunderstood me.
I mean atof, returning 0 on error, gives you the support to implement the elegant solution you proposed: it's a starting point.
Smile | :)

Rajesh R Subramanian26-Jun-08 1:24

Rajesh R Subramanian

26-Jun-08 1:24

Unfair vote[^] Hmmm | :|

Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
.·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·.
Codeproject.com: Visual C++ MVP

Re: Somebody voted me down for playing with you.

CPallini26-Jun-08 2:00