|
|
I've edited the tags. Basically I took out the tags that were either already covered, not as valuable in terms of users finding your article, and didn't quite apply. If you'd like a tag by tag breakdown, I'd be happy to discuss.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please let me know when you are ready to publish and I will see if I get the error.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have a class just for tables. Inside just put <table class="ArticleTable"> and you'll be using the design used for all tables on CodeProject.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
I will try it out. Thanks for the response.
|
|
|
|
|
Sweet!!! I just added the class to the existing table in my article and now it looks great[^].
thanks again! 
|
|
|
|
|
Wow. Someone who actually documents arcane command line stuff!
|
|
|
|
|
|
I haven't done DB work but still found your story hilarious.
After I started to use GUIs as a user, I never wanted to see command line stuff again. Ever. When Apple Macs came out, we used them for everything but development, which was on terminals hosted by IBM mainframes. When Unix workstations replaced the terminals, I was not pleased. Eventually I got up to speed, by why this suffering? With GUIs, you just poke around and figure out how to do most things without even reading the documentation. It was the same with MS-DOS. Having used a Mac, I thought it was total crap.
Of course, the software that I develop only has a command line interface. The problem with GUIs is that they're platform specific and add even more boilerplate, which C++ already provides enough of.
|
|
|
|
|
I want to offer some content to CodeProject as sponsored articles, is there any way can help me? Or who I can contact for more specific information?
|
|
|
|
|
I'd be happy to put you in contact with someone from our Sales Team. I'm forwarding them your information.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Sure, please contact me as soon as possible.
|
|
|
|
|
This[^] got approved, but there are some <span>'s and a couple of tags more in the snippets that shouldn't be there.
Could someone tidy it up a bit? Thanks
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I think ... the author fixed it?
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
it now looks fine indeed.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
@Sean-Ewington
I remember this guy[^] from a couple of conversations... you even jumped in in one of them[^]
He is back with a new version of his project[^]...
Should we get a step back or keep an eye on it?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 11-Dec-21 17:32pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I would say keep an eye on new content.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
As highlighted in QA, this article[^] has an expired link. The link to "download ResEdit from [here]" points to an expired domain, which could very easily be taken over by a site hosting malware.
The author appears to be long gone, and the article isn't much use without the missing download. Is it worth keeping the article with the link removed, or would it make more sense to remove the article?
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Good catch! In this case, we should remove the article.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
The article itself may come in handy for someone in the future that's looking for information on the subject.
Maybe keep the article with the removed links?
|
|
|
|
|
What's the best (easiest) way to make a minor update to an article I wrote that's already published?
Would be nice if I could somehow grab the whole HTML of the article, make the minor update (in HTML), and submit the revised version for publication.
How would I do that? (Or is there another way?)
|
|
|
|
|
1. Mouse over your user name at the top right and select "My Articles" from the drop-down menu.
2. Find your article in the list and open it by clicking on it.
3. Click on "Update Your article" at the upper right.
4. Now you're in the article editor. In the toolbar, click on "Source" toward the end of the first row to see the HTML version.
5. Make your change(s).
6. Click on "Preview" to check your work.
7. Fill in the "Briefly comment on what was changed" box, but this isn't really necessary for a minor edit.
8. Check "I have read and agree to the contributor's agreement" and click "Publish".
|
|
|
|