|
Sure I've heard of those things. They happen regularly. But in all my dealings, I want those outcomes to be voluntary, whether for me or someone else.
|
|
|
|
|
Were the options to the survey ninja updated?
W∴ Balboos, GHB wrote: One cannot choose "no front end"
I don't do front-end web development
W∴ Balboos, GHB wrote: "I like it naked"
Vanilla JS
W∴ Balboos, GHB wrote: "I roll my own".
Arguably also Vanilla JS; just with a higher degree of code reuse.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
You can literally choose all of those.
I don't do front-end web development, Vanilla JS and/or other are what you're looking for.
Maybe the survey guru is writing a book, but you can't even read so why do you care? 
|
|
|
|
|
W∴ Balboos, GHB wrote: One cannot choose "no front end"
Ya, that is an option. 
Social Media - A platform that makes it easier for the crazies to find each other.
Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it.
Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm currently using Vue, and love it. But if I have to stuck with a framework, my choice will be no framework. Or, maybe wasm...
|
|
|
|
|
Be careful with that[^]  
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isn't it time we moved to a binary webpage model? Why do we stick with a frankly piss-poor web delivery mechanism just because it started out human readable for ease of debugging?
Even in HTML5 version, it's a bad design that's been hacked to death and isn't fit for purpose in the modern world.
Sorry ... didn't mean to rant here.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Just an aside - HTML is essentially XML - and that's running heavily in VS for some time now. Wouldn't that be a better place to rant?
Else, it must have some redeeming characteristic - like how would extensibility (which is implicit - the browser works as best as it can even for new and unsupported features)
Can we do so for binary? Perhaps stored in each browsers HTML.dll file? How to handle all this. Certainly not impossible but will it really improve things?
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
I don't do web 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: I don't do web
And don't bother learning either. It is just a fad.
Social Media - A platform that makes it easier for the crazies to find each other.
Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it.
Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
|
|
|
|
|
I try not to do web but get dragged into it all the time. We don't use any of these frameworks, just JS, jQuery and something for layout/formatting called Bootstrap.
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
What I wish is that MS come up with a c# version of javascript. Strongly typed, and a language most of their web devs are familiar with. How could they go wrong?
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Isn't Typescript a step towards that direction?
|
|
|
|
|
IMHO, no. It's still javascript. I want to code client side in c#. If the "compiler" converts it to javascript, that's fine, but I want to code in c#.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I would like that, too.
|
|
|
|
|
Me neither. 
"They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers! Can I get an amen?"
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
