So far 7 moderators have reviewed your article. Three said it was "unclear or incomplete", and four think it should be a tip, not an article. I was in the first group: I know nothing about what you're discussing, so an introductory paragraph defining "cross-entropy loss" would be helpful. Perhaps the other moderators are familiar with the term but think the article is too sketchy, or something that anyone with knowledge of the area could write.
I have checked and think that it is way too specific to be posted without any explanation about what are you talking about or at least a link to somewhere where it is explained correctly.
I didn't approve or report it, but if, I would go for unclear, since it doesn't explain it in a way I can minimally understand it without any other external help.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
Over a day later and it still doesn't not work. The article is published, but there is a serious bug in the code which will annoy users. I was able to add a comment with the fix, but not update the article with a new ZIP file. The ZIP is less than 100 Kb so is fine sizewise.