Comments by CatchExAs

CatchExAs 27-Nov-15 10:58am View

Reason for my vote of 5 \n Nice work

CatchExAs 11-Sep-14 12:40pm View

Only the OP knows exactly what he wants to achieve. If it's to use C++ to rapidly build UI software then my advice might point him in a helpful direction. Insulting him and me helps no one.

CatchExAs 11-Sep-14 8:05am View

Was the designer in VB6 not called 'WinForms' or similar?
If so, then you just sound pompous which is worse.

CatchExAs 14-Jul-14 17:45pm View

Reason for my vote of 5 \n Pretty good work, I've never actually seen someone use this in the wild though.

CatchExAs 14-Jul-14 17:40pm View

Reason for my vote of 3 \n OK, but how is this useful and would be nice if there was code attached.

CatchExAs 14-Jul-14 17:30pm View

Reason for my vote of 5 \n Gave me a few chuckles so whenever I get asked about this will be sure to point them your way.

CatchExAs 10-Jul-14 19:12pm View

Reason for my vote of 5 \n Preferred the non-reflective version, but still nice. But why not fix the problem at source (i.e. in the sproc)?

CatchExAs 10-Jul-14 14:38pm View

Reason for my vote of 4 \n Nice explanation

CatchExAs 8-Jul-14 19:08pm View

Reason for my vote of 5 \n Would like to hear more about the code generator.
Interop with a C/C lib is unlikely to provide better performance, I tried this in my parallelism article.
Your delegate usage is better than my hard coded version ;)

CatchExAs 30-Apr-14 9:31am View

Reason for my vote of 3 \n I was going to give you 5 but, I can't help but think that you'd find it easier to build this with Rx or StreamInsight. If you can argue otherwise and I can modify my vote then I will :)

Comments by CatchExAs (Top 10 by date)